تصویب موافقت نامه های همکاریهای قضایی بین المللی؛ مشکلات و راه حل ها

author

Abstract:

  Domestic courts of every country need to interact and cooperate with foreign courts to deal with cases in connection with the legal and judicial system of a foreign state such as extradition, transfer of prisoners, investigation of accused or hearing the witnesses who may be reside in the territory of a foreign state.   However, achievement this goal often requires to have a special Act which assures the reciprocity action of every state. Therefore, the best way is to provide for the agreements of legal and judicial assistance between states. These agreements, bilaterally or multilaterally, oblige the states to cooperate with each other.     In Iran, before the Islamic Revolution, a total of five agreements have been signed mainly with neighboring states. Now, this number has increased to 45 and a total of 110 different agreements are currently under discussion.     In this situation, approving of these agreements has been systematically denied by the Guardian Council of the Constitution. In contrast, the Expediency Council systematically approves these agreements. But such a cycle would not supportable and therefore, a solution should be found.     This study suggests some legal solutions and General Policies which helps the Guardian Council to confirm the agreements relating to the international judicial and legal assistance.  

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

تأثیر موافقت نامه های اداری بر تعهدات بین المللی دولتها

  Today the leaders of countries are not the only ones which are participating in the treaty- making process. Along with formal treaties many international agreements are signed at lower levels of government and administrative officials have signed them. From the viewpoint of international law, administrative agreements such as treaties provide rights and duties for states and they are also gov...

full text

بررسی ابهامات صلاحیت مجلس شورای اسلامی در تصویب موافقت نامه های بین المللی با نگاهی به نظرهای شورای نگهبان

اصول 77 و 125 قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران در مقام تبیین جایگاه موافقت نامه های بین المللی و تعیین صلاحیت قوای مقننه و مجریه در فرایند انعقاد آن هاست. با وجود نگارش کتاب ها و مقالات متعدد در زمینه ی حقوق معاهدات و صلاحیت های قانونی نهادهای حکومتی در این زمینه، همچنان نقاط ابهام فراوانی در خصوص صلاحیت مجلس شورای اسلامی در تصویب موافقت نامه های بین المللی مانند امکان سنجی تصویب معاهدات بین الم...

full text

تأثیر موافقت نامه های اداری بر تعهدات بین المللی دولتها

امروزه دیگر این رﺅسای کشورها نیستند که در فرایند معاهده سازی شرکت دارند. در کنار معاهدات رسمی و تشریفاتی، توافقهای بین المللی زیادی در سطوح پایین دولت منعقد می شوند و مقامات اداری و اجرایی شخصاً آنها را امضا می کنند. از نظر حقوق بین الملل، موافقت نامه های اداری، معاهده بوده و از جهت ایجاد حق یا تکلیف برای دولت هیچ گونه تفاوتی با معاهدات رسمی ندارند. بر این توافقها مقررات بین المللی به ویژه حقوق ...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 19  issue 66

pages  39- 74

publication date 2014-08

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Keywords

No Keywords

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023